Feature Toggles (a.k.a. Feature Flags) is a very powerful pattern to test and introduce new features in a production environment. I started to experiment with Togglz as a OSS library to implement what I needed. While I used Spring-Boot to demostrate my use of Togglz, this can be done with any other framework.

For Spring-Boot, the documentation says all you need is to add the following:

1
2
3
4
5
  <dependency>
    <groupId>org.togglz</groupId>
    <artifactId>togglz-spring-boot-starter</artifactId>
    <version>2.6.1.Final</version>
  </dependency>

This is not completely true as the following error occurs:

  [ERROR] contextLoads  Time elapsed: 0 s  <<< ERROR!
  java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
  org/springframework/web/servlet/config/annotation/WebMvcConfigurerAdapter

It appears you need to use the following dependency:

1
2
3
4
  <dependency>
    <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
    <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
  </dependency>

This makes the code to compile without problems. Of course, I also needed the console module, so I added:

1
2
3
4
5
  <dependency>
    <groupId>org.togglz</groupId>
    <artifactId>togglz-console</artifactId>
    <version>2.6.1.Final</version>
  </dependency>

This allowed me to have a working app with features enabled/disabled (very quickly I may add). Next was unto setting up a feature flag. This was very easy with the following properties:

1
2
3
4
5
6
  togglz.console.enabled=true
  togglz.console.path=/toggles
  togglz.console.secured=false
  togglz.console.use-management-port=false
  togglz.features.FAKE_JMS_LOAD.label=Fake JMS Load
  togglz.features.FAKE_JMS_LOAD.enabled=true

Notice that I had to change the configuration to also not use the management port. This is described here.

A few things I would like to see in future distributions of Togglz:

• Given that Spring-Boot is simple to use, I think we should be able to have a way to add the owner of a given toggle. This is not possible with the existing API.
• In general, Togglz does not have a way to add more description to the flag. This seems like an essential feature, and I can see how much info can get lost.

In general, this seems like a good simple implementation of the “Feature Flag” pattern that provides a nice UI to non-technical folks to manage. It’s definitely a great start, but I can see having the need to have more features.